While most legal professionals are familiar with legal holds, that doesn’t mean they look forward to receiving one. While properly executing a legal hold doesn’t have to be complicated, compliance requires careful planning and preparation.
A legal hold, also known as a litigation hold, is the process organizations use to inform relevant parties (custodians) that they must preserve their data for anticipated litigation. The duty to preserve evidence can be court-ordered or self-initiated for internal investigations, breach of contract, or a complaint that could trigger or threaten litigation.
A legal hold applies to hard copies of documents – logs, notes, forms, bulletins, photographs, appointment books, and any other type of physical records – and to electronically stored information (ESI), including any relevant electronic data, no matter the format or storage method.
A legal hold prevents the spoliation of evidence to ensure that a plaintiff will have fair access to any information that might be relevant to their case. Rule 37(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) addresses sanctions for failure to preserve ESI, including potential jury instructions revealing that the lost information was unfavorable to the party or even case dismissal or default judgment. Disputes over the spoliation of evidence and resulting sanctions requests are among the most common eDiscovery disputes every year.
The timing of a legal hold can impact an entire case. In Zubulake v. UBS Warburg, the court ruled that evidence should have been preserved before filing the case. “Once a party reasonably anticipates litigation, it must suspend its routine document retention/destruction policy and put in place a ‘litigation hold’ to ensure the preservation of relevant documents.” The plaintiff’s motion for adverse inference instruction sanctions was granted, and the jury ultimately awarded $29.2 million in damages.
Traditionally a manual procedure, legal holds are now highly automated with technology. The process typically includes the following steps:
A defensible legal hold process will help prevent adverse outcomes, avoid legal sanctions, and minimize organizational risk. As a result, many organizations have automated the legal hold process.
Several issues with the traditional legal hold process can result in data spoliation and non-compliance, putting an organization at risk. These include:
Legal hold software helps manage the process by automating the issuing of holds, sending notifications and reminders, interviewing custodians, monitoring compliance, tracking progress, and preserving relevant information.
Before addressing preservation and legal holds, an organization must have sound data retention and information governance policies in place to effectively manage the data subject to holds. General best practices for conducting a defensible legal hold include:
No matter how your team handles a legal hold, there are always opportunities to expedite your process to ensure a comprehensive and defensible collection across all information sources.
The Onna platform simplifies and expedites the legal hold process to help teams manage preservation and centralize the information subject to the legal hold in one secure place.
To find out more, check out our data retention policy template and get started today.